Everyone is an Adventurer

The very first time I ran B/X for my group of friends, I gave a handout to each player with some basic guidelines to get everyone thinking in the right mindset. Here's the handout: The Super Hexcrawl World Player Guidelines.

I don't use this handout anymore, but much of what is written on it is still applicable to the current campaign, most notably the very first bullet point, "Everyone is an adventurer." I wanted this to be the very first thing that anyone who played in one of my games read. This sentence is as fundamental of a concept to the core game as Hit Points and Armor Class are.

There are plenty of role-playing games where your character can have a wide range of motivations, from political aspirations to becoming a gourmet chef. I've always been of the opinion that Dungeons & Dragons doesn't lend itself terribly well to things outside the scope of exploration, dungeon crawling, and combat. That isn't to say that you can't have a D&D campaign with a heavy focus on political intrigue or espionage, just that there are plenty of other games out there that may be better suited for those styles of play.

Upon hearing about Basic D&D for the first time many players will inevitably ask, "What if my character doesn't care about accumulating wealth?" This bullet point nips that question in the bud right away, by telling the player that their character must have a desire to plunder treasure, because that is simply the game we are playing. It is a game about collecting treasure, and it is a requirement that your character be interested in doing that. There is no "what if"; your character can ONLY be someone who is interested in collecting treasure.

The same goes for risking life and limb traveling through a hostile overworld to reach dungeons -- when you create a character, your character must have some predisposition to explore dangerous environments. It's a game about exploring dungeons, so creating a character that isn't interested in dungeons is antithetical to the game. This is never more true of any edition of any role-playing game than it is of Moldvay's Basic, where there aren't any rules pertaining to anything outside the dungeon whatsoever. Without the addition of Expert, the entire game is the dungeon.

That's why "Everyone is an adventurer" is paramount. It's not to say that characters can't have other hopes or aspirations -- by all means, learn how to cook on your downtime, and once you've saved up enough gold to open your own gourmet restaurant feel free to retire. What the character thinks or believes is entirely up to the player, and can change on a whim. The only requirement is that the character has to be someone who spends most of their time breaking into crypts and ancient ruins to steal forgotten fortunes, because that's what the game is fundamentally about.

Old School Adventurers in the Frozen North

Hello there! I love basic D&D. That's why I've been running a monthly game for it.

1981 Moldvay Basic

I've been playing roleplaying games for about 20 years, and a lot of that time has been spent behind the screen, running games for other people. For several years now I've been consuming massive amounts of OSR content, and working on an expansive, potentially endless campaign. I've ran multiple playtests with friends both in person and online, and revised and changed the game based on their feedback. Although the exact system and house rules have changed over time, I always end up coming back to B/X with a smidgen of houserules.

Earlier this summer I decided it was finally time to get a semi-regular game going. I recruited my friends, some of which are huge fans of OSR and Basic D&D, and some of which have never played an edition older than 5th before. We have been meeting every 2-4 weeks to play, and the plan is to continue this campaign indefinitely. I'll be using this blog to talk about my experiences at these sessions, as well as going over my thought process at the table.

I've always wanted to start a blog where I post the OSR content I've created, but I dislike the idea of posting things like rules, encounters, and systems without having first tested them at the table. There are a lot of really great OSR bloggers out there, but there is also a fair amount of armchair dungeon mastering going on. That is to say, authors who have never and will never playtest the content they publicly release. There can still be some value to this content if it leads to getting the brain juices flowing, but more often than not I've found that a lot of this content, even some of the more popular stuff within the community, doesn't really hold up to scrutiny when playtested.

I don't say this as an attack on any particular OSR content creator, but rather to stress my primary goal going forward with this blog: all gameable content released on this blog will have already seen at least minimal playtesting in actual games prior to being posted here. In just a few months worth of sessions, I have already made a massive amount of changes to all the work I've done based on feedback and playtesting with my group. At this point, pretty much everything I've produced whole cloth has become a living document under constant revision.

Whether my content ends up getting cribbed for your own game or simply inspires you to make something entirely different from scratch, I hope this blog will prove to be a useful tool for those in the D&D and OSR communities.

- AJ Forrest (pseudonym)